ABSTRACT
Limb salvage surgery is the preferred treatment for bone tumors in the current surgical practice. The aim of this study was to compare the functional outcomes between amputation and limb salvage surgery based on the level of surgery at two levels: knee and hip. A single institutional analysis of 137 patients with lower extremity bone tumors was done between 2014 and 2020. Eighty-seven patients treated with amputation were compared with 50 patients treated with limb salvage surgery based on following variables: age, gender, histology, anatomic site, and MSTS score. The mean MSTS scores were fairly better in patients who underwent surgery at knee level compared to those who underwent surgery at hip level. The mean MSTS score at 1-year follow-up was 22.0 in amputation group compared to 22.4 in limb salvage group, whereas at 2-year follow-up was 24.1 in amputation group compared to 25.1 in limb salvage group. At knee level, functional outcomes were similar after amputation and limb salvage. At hip level, patients undergoing amputation had poorer MSTS scores compared to limb salvage surgery at 2-year follow-up (p = 0.04). The functional outcomes for patients undergoing surgery at knee level were similar irrespective of type of surgery. At longer follow-up, patients undergoing amputation at hip level had a poorer functional outcome compared to limb salvage surgery. Although limb salvage was associated with similar MSTS scores when compared with amputation, it produced a better functional outcome especially for proximally located tumors.
